20. A PLASTIC TSUNAMI ENTERING HUMAN BODIES

Courtesy Greenpeace, plastic in Kinshasa

Dear reader,

Summary: We consume more plastics than we think. Especially the smallest particles, the Nanoplastics, can have a bad effect on your long-term health. Science is working hard, much is still unclear, but signs are not good. Try to limit your contact with plastic significantly. Avoid using plastic bottles, plastic coffee and tea cups and chewing gum. See point 8 how to minimise your exposure to these plastic particles.

  1. Research only at its infancy/I am worried

I know research is ongoing and final conclusions will take years, but doesn’t this micro and nanoplastic stuff sound scary? Plastics might sound innocuous, but there are many types, some of which can cause cancer or other diseases. 

The effect of all these micro- and Nanoplastics entering our bodies is still unknown. The more I read, the more concerned I become. Plastics are a holistic concept, but when you break them down you enter a world dangerous additives. You also read about Nanoplastics as molecular pollutants that attach to fungus, algae and bacteria.

Writing this blog did not help, nor did these alarming headlines: “0.5% of the brain consists of Nanoplastics,” “Nanoplastics found in penises,” and “Nanoplastics entering individual cell structures.”

2, Most experts downplay the risk,

Experts claim that the public is overreacting. A quarter of the Dutch population believes that microplastics, and especially Nanoplastics, are among the top dangers to one’s health. The Dutch are perhaps exaggerating, but probably not. From what I have read this plastic future does not look all too good.

We do not know what interaction might occur between these smallest particles and living organisms. The idea that the tiniest particles can enter your individual cells is worrying. In reality, they do enter your cells. The increasing amount of plastic found in people’s brains is also not a good sign.

Dear reader, I don’t know about you. I am truly concerned. There seems to be no end to the plastic tsunami that overwhelms us. This news from the Netherlands is a bit off topic but related. It states that eggs from free-ranging chickens are too dangerous to eat. Can you imagine? Apparently, there is so much poison in the Dutch soil that it impacts the quality of food the chicken eat. This, in turn, affects the quality of the eggs.

There are actions we can take, such as avoiding these contaminated eggs. Or, in the case of plastics, minimizing their use as much as possible. Below are some tips in this blog.

For everything else, we must keep an eye on scientific developments.

3. Ok, what are micro plastics and Nanoplastics?

Microplastics are small plastic particles. They are usually defined as being less than 5 millimeters in size. However, they can be much smaller. They originate from the breakdown of larger plastic debris, like bottles and bags. They also include fragments of stabilizers, lubricants, fillers, and plasticizes. Manufacturers use these and other chemicals to impart desirable properties to plastics. Such properties include transparency, flexibility, and durability. Many of these chemicals have been classified by experts as toxic and harmful to human health.

Microplastics are widespread in the environment, found in oceans, waterways, soil, and even in the air. They pose increasing environmental challenges. Microplastics contaminate ecosystems and enter food chains, such as in fish. Animals and humans can ingest them, potentially causing harm over time.

Nanoplastics (sometimes calles nanoparticles, but this is a wider concept) are particles less than 100 nanometers in size. This size is less than 1/10,000 of a millimeter. They are much smaller than microplastics and more concerning because they can overcome certain barriers and enter human cells. They can be purposefully engineered in various scientific and industrial processes. For example, they are used for materials like carbon nanotubes. Alternatively, they may occur naturally in some processes. They can also result from the further breakdown of microplastics.

4. Just some plastic statistics

In 2020, approximately 367 million tons of plastics were produced worldwide. This amount is almost double that of 2000, which had an annual production of 200 million tons. Production is still growing on an annual basis.

Researchers estimate that the average person consumes between 78,000 and 211,000 microplastic particles every year. Plastic-based bottled water has a big role in these figures. Hot drinks in plastic cups can also contribute significantly. Together, they can make up to 50% of the intake. And remember, we talk about the micro plastics, the “big” particles, up to half a centimeter! every year through drinking water, foods contaminated by microplastics, and breathing microplastics-containing air. The number of Nanoplastics is infinitively more and can be 200.000 in one plastic bottle with water.

Fortunately, most, but not all leaves our body again the natural way.

In early 2024, a new study revealed that human brain samples collected at autopsy contained significantly more plastic. They had seven to 30 times more plastic than the kidneys and liver. Compared to 2016, this concentration represents about a 50% increase, indicating that, as of today, about 99.5% of the brain is brain tissue and the rest is plastic.

5. Not only plastic bottles and plastic coffee cups are of concern. Chewing gum as well.

A pilot study presented at the American Chemical Society’s spring 2025 meeting revealed that chewing gum can release hundreds to thousands of micro and nano plastic particles into saliva, which are then potentially ingested.

6. Dangers of micro- and nanoplastics

Microplastics and Nanoplastics have infiltrated ecosystems worldwide and have been detected in air, water and soil. Their small size allows them to enter the human body through ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact. Chemical additives like polychlorinated biphenyls and phthalate esters are added to microplastics during production. These additives typically exacerbate health effects. Microplastics are therefore recognized as an emerging environmental concern. They are also a public health concern. These concerns have the potential to affect both human well-being and the natural environment.

The much smaller parts, the Nanoplastics, can penetrate biological barriers. They enter cells and tissues, raising concerns about long-term health effects. It alarms me to learn that microplastic and nano plastic concentrations in brain samples are seven to 30 times higher. These concentrations are notably higher than those in kidneys and liver. As always with relative new developments, more studies need to be done to understand what the health implications are.

The mechanisms by which Nanoplastics enter the brain remain unclear. One hypothesis is that they travel with lipids ingested through food. Human brains are particularly rich in fat, which may help plastics cross the blood-brain barrier. Inhalation of airborne microplastics and ingestion through diet are considered primary routes of exposure.

7. Just one example how plastic pollution originates and affects us all

Biosolids, which are the treated water sludge generated from wastewater treatment, significantly contribute to plastic pollution in terrestrial environments. They are commonly utilized as fertilizers in agricultural land. This practice results in a considerable deposition of microplastics onto farmlands. In Europe, estimates vary between 63,000 to 430,000 tons of microplastics are deposited annually. In North America, the range is 44,000 to 300,000 tons. Consequently, agricultural soils serve as extensive reservoirs of microplastics. These particles are transported to the aquatic environment through various means. These means include rainfall, leaching, and irrigation.

8. First suspected links with diseases

There is ongoing debate over the health impacts of these microplastics within human tissues. These risks encompass inflammation, oxidative stress, and tissue damage. They have been found in vital organs such as the heart, liver, lungs, and even placenta. 

One study also found that individuals with dementia have more plastic fragments in their brains. The amount is three to five times higher than those without the condition. It was noted that dementia can impair the blood-brain barrier and brain clearance mechanisms, possibly creating a “sink” for plastics. Again, no definitive proof yet.

Some experts argue that nano plastics carry harmful chemicals. These chemicals are known to lead to reproductive issues. They cause hormonal imbalances by disrupting the endocrine function.

There appears to be a link between plastics and obesity.

9. What to do?

Summary: reducing exposure to microplastics and nano particles involves several lifestyle and consumer choices. Below some suggestions I summarized from reliable sources on internet.chapter

My own top 5 is: never heat anything in plastic, avoid drinks from plastic bottles (= no 1 tip), do not drink hot drinks from plastic, store in metal or porcelain, repack from plastic in metal, glass or porcelain, not cutting food on plastic cutting-board. I cut everything on an ordinary porcelain plate. And stop chewing gum.

Suggestions from internet

Filtering and boiling water.

Cutting back on plastic use when possible, for example, by using reusable containers

Boosting fiber intake involves two types of fiber. Fermentable fiber found in fruits and vegetables forms a gel-like substance in your gut. This helps trap microplastics and prevents them from entering your system. Meanwhile, non-fermentable fiber helps push these harmful particles through your digestive tract. It does this before they can be absorbed. In a world where microplastics are unavoidable, fiber could be your best defense

Not using single-use plastic over and over.

Avoiding heating plastic food packaging, as plastic particles can spread into the food.

Focusing on good sources for our food is essential. We should ensure our seafood is from sources that have less microplastics, for example.

Avoid foods that are ultra-processed, as there have been some reports of MNPs (=micro and nano plastics) in ultra-processed food.

Wearing natural fiber clothing — organic cotton or hemp — and avoiding those with synthetic fibers.

Vacuuming our homes more often, as microplastics can accumulate in household dust.

Being careful of environmental pollutants as high air pollution areas might have more MNPs in air.

Making sure our environment at home or work has a good air ventilation system.

This was a difficult blog to write. Too little is known about this topic, but from what we know one can only draw one conclusion: stay away as much as possible from plastics, but this will be hard to do.

Robert, your health friend,

traffic in Kinshasa, DRC. On a quiet day

3. FISH IS HEALTHY, BUT NOT TOO MUCH PLEASE (health project99+)

Summary: eating fish is healthy. However, due to an increasing number of foreign substances like mercury, one has to limit fish consumption. When I realized this I cut down my fish consumption by half.

Fish: great, but from now on a cautious “yes”

At home, we used to eat fish almost every day over the past five years. The health benefits of fish are well known. However, we neglected important dangers. Issues like PCBs, nano plastics, and mercury are truly concerning. Other heavy metals and antibiotics in farmed fish also worry me as an enthusiastic fish consumer. 

So I dived into this topic to see whether we could continue eating fish every day. The short and sad conclusion is “no”. It was already “no” to farmed fish. We should also avoid fish that is most likely to have high levels of mercury. PCBs and nano plastics are also concerns. This is all easier said than done. When buying fish, the amounts of mercury and other harmful components are not labeled. They probably never will be, as they are difficult to measure. With mercury it is more or less known which fish is mercury heavy and which not. When it comes to farmed fish, you can find out what is wrong. But what about other heavy metals? PCBs? Nano plastics?

2. Why take the risk?

To those who say that the Japanese eat fish almost daily, I admit I have no answer. They argue that Japanese are among the longest-living people in the world. Food and health are complex issues, as I have come to realize over the past few years. 

Not everything is scientifically proven. However, there are many indications of potential negative effects from eating fish more than a few times per week. So, why take the risk? Especially when you can maintain a very balanced diet without consuming fish daily.

3. Do you need fish for your necessary protein intake?

We humans have several other protein sources legumes, nuts, eggs, light French quark, soya milk, seeds, and plant-based proteins. In another blog I wrote that people tend to undereat protein, something that is very harmful especially if one ages. Eating fish helps. Chicken also helps. For us, fish is “just” one of the protein sources. It is an important contributor to a tasty meal.

4. Just to repeat the benefits of fish. It is an excellent source of high-quality protein. It also provides omega-3 fatty acids, especially in fatty fish like herring and salmon. Additionally, it contains vitamins such as vitamin D and B2. It also has minerals like calcium, phosphorus, iron, zinc, iodine, magnesium, and potassium. Omega-3 fatty acids are beneficial for heart health. They may lower the risk of heart attack and stroke. He/she who eats fatty fish a few times per week really should not take Omega-3 supplements. 

One portion of fatty fish can provide a significant amount of EPA and DHA. Fish like salmon, mackerel, sardines, or herring can offer approximately 250 to 500 mg of these nutrients. The exact amount depends on the type and size of the fish. This amount is typically recommended for maintaining overall heart health. Most sources I read talk about two portions per week of fatty fish.

5. Lean (white) fish typically contains much lower levels of omega-3 fatty acids. This is in comparison to fatty fish such as salmon, mackerel, sardines, and herring. Omega-3 fatty acids are primarily found in the fats of fish. White fish are usually much leaner, so they provide fewer omega-3s. They remain a healthy option as they provide high-quality protein, vitamins, and minerals. 

Some examples of lean fish include Cod, Haddock, Pollock, Hake, Flounder, and Sole. Tilapia (but see my critical remarks on farmed fish), Whiting, Bass, and Shrimps are also lean fish. The following white fish are, unfortunately high on mercury: Sea bream, Sea bass and Turbot.

All international health agencies recommend two portions of fish, with a maximum of three (150 grams). At least one portion should be fatty fish, like herring or salmon. The other can be white fish like cod. White fish lack however the all-important omega-3 with EPA (“eicosapentaenoic acid”) and DHA (“docosahexaenoic acid”),

6. Mercury: important to realize the potential impact on your health

In this blog, I delve a bit deeper into one of the dangers of eating fish: mercury. It is a hazardous heavy metal that we primarily ingest through eating fish. Once it reaches the brain, it can remain there for decades, accumulating and impacting the nervous system. Serious stuff. Other heavy metals, PCBs, and nano plastics might be just as dangerous. These topics will be discussed in other blogs.

(NotePCBs, or Polychlorinated Biphenyls, are a group of man-made organic chemicals consisting of carbon, hydrogen, and chlorine atoms. They were widely used in various industrial and commercial applications. PCBs have been found to have significant environmental and health impacts; studies are ongoing.)

Some things are recent developments, like nano plastics. We know it is a developing health scare worldwide. Its consequences are not yet known. I cannot imagine that it is good for your body. Who wasn’t alarmed to read that the average adult brain now contains a spoonful of nano plastics? Also a topic for a future blog.

7. From mercury to methylmercury: a technical explanation

Mercury is a global pollutant. It enters water bodies for 1/3 through atmospheric deposition. This deposition results from natural events like volcanic eruptions. For 2/3, mercury enters through human activities such as coal burning and industrial processes. 

The legacy of human use of mercury has caused mercury to be released into the environment in enormous quantities. These releases amount to hundreds of thousands of tons. The levels of mercury in the atmosphere at the moment are up to 500 % above natural levels. In the oceans, the concentrations of mercury are about 200 % above natural levels.

Mercury can undergo chemical transformations once it is deposited to the landscape. Of greatest concern to fish, wildlife, and humans is mercury’s conversion to methylmercury. This conversion is most common in wetlands that are periodically flooded, where the bacteria that facilitate the process are abundant.

Fish absorb methylmercury from the water they live in and from the organisms they eat. Methylmercury is a highly toxic form that accumulates in fish, especially in long-lived and predatory species.

8, Bioconcentration (or biomagnification) refers to the process by which mercury concentrations increase as they move up the food chain. This process results in higher concentrations in higher-level predators such as fish, birds, minks, and otters. Through bioconcentration, mercury levels can increase by 100 to 1,000 times or more. As a result, even low concentrations of mercury in water can contaminate an entire food chain. This contamination makes fish unsafe for human consumption.

Mercury usage and emissions have been reduced in regions such as Europe and North America. Despite this, environmental levels of mercury are likely to remain high for a long time. This persistence is due to mercury’s long lifetime in the environment and increasing emissions in other parts of the world. These emissions can travel long distances. In fact, about half of the mercury deposited in Europe comes from outside the continent.

The biological half-life of mercury is estimated to be approximately 30 to 60 days in the body. The half-life of mercury in the brain is not entirely clear. However, it is estimated to be as long as approximately 20 years.

9. Fish with high or low mercury level

Mercury levels differ from one species of fish to the next. This is due to factors such as the type of fish, size, location, habitat, diet and age.

Fish that are predatory (eat other fish) are large and at the top of the food chain, and so tend to contain more mercury. This includes tuna and swordfish. Try to avoid them and go for wild salmon, herring, sardines etc.

10. Potential Health impact is serious

The health impacts of mercury are dose-related, but the main concern is its impact on fetuses and young children. Mercury exposure can occur in the womb due to a mother’s consumption of seafood, which can have significant and lifelong effects on a baby’s developing brain and nervous system. This exposure can affect memory, language, attention, and other skills. In Europe alone, it is estimated that more than 1.8 million children are born each year with mercury levels above recommended safe limits.

In adults, chronic mercury exposure can lead to neurological and developmental issues. Symptoms of mercury poisoning can include tremors, memory problems, and cognitive deficits. In severe cases, it can affect kidney function and the respiratory system. Mercury exposure can also potentially impact cardiovascular and immune health in adults.

11. Possible symptoms of methylmercury poisoning may include

Loss of peripheral vision; pins and needles” feelings, usually in the hands, feet, and around the mouth; lack of coordination of movements; impairment of speech, hearing, walking; and/or muscle weakness.

12. Testing

It is possible to measure the levels of mercury in your body through blood tests, urine tests, and hair analysis. The last method is particularly interesting. Measuring mercury levels in hair can provide an estimate of long-term exposure to methylmercury. Hair accumulates mercury steadily as it grows. This reflects exposure over months rather than days. This is useful for assessing chronic exposure.

13. My Experience

For years, we enjoyed our daily fish meals. However, preparing this blog made me realize my naivety during all those years. Yes, fish is healthy. However, it can also carry many harmful substances. These include heavy metals, PCBs, nano plastics, and antibiotics.

We ate tinned sardines and mackerel. We also had deep-frozen cod from the North Atlantic. Of course, we enjoyed sustainably fished fresh Dutch herring and the occasional wild salmon.

It proved to be almost impossible to get hard data on which fish carries which substances. It is probably too complex; I realize this. But, I have read too much worrying news from reliable sources to continue with my current level of fish consumption.

So we decided to cut down on fish. We enjoy Dutch herring once or twice a week. We have wild salmon once a week. Both are oily fish providing omega-3 fatty acids.

Additionally, I will do a hair analysis to check if mercury has accumulated in my body.

Time for dinner, but no fish tonight :). Enjoy a long and healthy life,

Robert, your health friend